| Untagged | 4 Mar 2010 |
Fishy Businessby erik |
|
Bloggers
- Erik Michelsen (104)
- Diana Muller (16)
- Cindy Wallace (8)
- Administrator (4)
Tags
Categories
Latest Blog Entry
Feedburner
Blog Login
Federation Blog
| Pollution | 26 Feb 2010 |
Let's Stop Swimming in Sewageby erik |
|
Former West/Rhode Riverkeeper Bob Gallagher recently had a great letter to the editor published in the Capital. Several Waterkeeper groups, including the Federation, have signed on in support of the Attorney General's bills that he references below. Please contact your legislators and ask them to support the bills as well:
Federal regulations regarding vessels with installed toilets have been in effect since 1980. At that time, it became a crime to dump untreated sewage from a boat to the water. The concern then was bacteria pollution. The law eliminated discharge of a dangerous pollutant from an easily controllable source.
The law has an exception for boats that have toilet systems that grind up the waste and kill the bacteria before the waste is pumped overboard. These systems remain legal except in a few designated "no discharge zones."
The 1987 Chesapeake Bay Agreement called for the elimination of "pollutant discharges from recreational boats." We now understand that pollution from nutrients like nitrogen is the biggest problem facing our rivers and the bay. Sewage from boats, whether treated or untreated, is a highly concentrated form of nitrogen pollution. Pumping even treated boat waste overboard is like dumping fertilizer in the bay.
Attorney General Doug Gansler has recently caused the introduction of legislation that would expand no discharge zones to include all Maryland waters (SB 513/HB 1257). Gansler's bill would require that boats that have these currently exempt "treatment systems" have them pumped out just like the great majority of other boats that store waste in holding tanks.
Less responsible elements of the maritime industry oppose the bill for the reason that boats affected by the legislation contribute only a very small amount to the nitrogen pollution that is suffocating the bay.
With the current state of water quality in the Bay, we need to stop nitrogen pollution from every controllable source. Moreover, why should any of us have to swim or crab near a boat that is discharging "treated" sewage? I support the Attorney General's bill.
Bob Gallagher
| Untagged | 22 Feb 2010 |
South River Hypoxic Zoneby diana |
|
| Untagged | 16 Feb 2010 |
Sampling Much?by diana |
|
You all may not be seeing me out on the South River until spring. This snow and ice has kept me from going on patrol or sampling, which gave me time to give the boat a new coat of bottom paint and an oil change for the Honda. Hope to see you all on the river soon.---diana
| Untagged | 5 Feb 2010 |
Legislative Update from Annapolis - Feb. 5by erik |
|
In the past couple of weeks, bills to expand the uses of Bay Restoration Fund (BRF) dollars (SB 20/HB 313) were introduced. These bills would allow the septic portion of the BRF to be used to subsidize the conversion of communities with failing septic systems to sewer, in some instances. Given that there are a number of such communities on the South River and in Anne Arundel County, this has been a priority for the Federation for the past 2 years. Our hope is that we can get it passed this session. Calls to legislators in support of these bills are always appreciated.
Finally, as you may have read in the paper, the Watershed Protection & Restoration Act (SB 686/ HB999), which require local jurisdictions implement a fee on existing impervious surfaces to create a dedicated funding source for stormwater retrofits, is a priority for the environmental community and the Federation. In Anne Arundel County alone, there is estimated to be a $1 billion backlog of stormwater restoration repairs that are currently needed. A dedicated source of funds to address these issues on a continuing basis is the only way we can hope to make progress on this restoration work which is so critical to improving water quality. The bills will be dropped in the House and Senate next week and we will alert you as soon as they are.
| Untagged | 30 Jan 2010 |
'Ignorance' as Advantageby erik |
|
The idea that ignorance could be a strength sounds odd (unless you're an Orwell fan), but the acknowledgment that one has significant knowledge gaps, rather than a full or almost complete understanding of an incredibly complex system, can be empowering, particularly in an evolving discipline. That case is well made by Dr. Eugene Turner in the article linked here, "The value of 'ignorance' in restoration."
The central thesis is that the assumption that "restoration" is bound to work is very likely a road to perpetuating failure. If we aren't monitoring what works and what doesn't, and revising our strategy when things don't work, we're going to end up wasting a lot of time and money and missing great opportunities to improve outcomes.
| Pollution | 28 Jan 2010 |
Stormwater Talk at the Legislative Summitby erik |
|
On Tuesday evening, the environmental community gathered in Annapolis to discuss our legislative agenda. In the clip below, I discuss the reasons we need a state requirement for local stormwater utilities. Video courtesy West/Rhode Riverkeeper, Chris Trumbauer.
| Untagged | 20 Jan 2010 |
Sampling the South River Family Styleby diana |
|

Andrew Muller pulling the anchor for me on the South River after we were done water quality monitoring.
| History, Bacon Ridge Branch | 18 Jan 2010 |
The Headwaters From Aboveby erik |
|
Meeting with a landowner last week, I came across this 1970s era photo of their farm above Bacon Ridge Branch. The photo is taken looking southeast towards the river, with St. Stephen's Church Road in the lower right-hand corner. It really gives a great sense of how little development there was in the headwaters during that time, and just how rolling and dramatic the topography is throughout that entire area.

| Fauna, Church Creek | 13 Jan 2010 |
Church Creek Surpriseby erik |
|
The Federation is working with a local landowner to undertake a massive restoration effort on the headwaters of Church Creek, just about Route 665 (Aris T. Allen Blvd). As part of that effort, we have hired an environmental consulting firm to design and permit plans for the project. Earlier this morning, I met out at the site with the consultant to walk the property and get a sense of the lay of the land.
Currently, the property is at the confluence of two streams (below), one coming from Route 2 and one from Old Forest Dr. (by the Allen Apartments) than drain some of the most heavily urbanized and paved portions of the South River watershed. The restoration plan is to create a stream and wetland system that will trap and process sediment and nutrients from upstream and provide high quality habitat for fish, birds, and amphibians.

As was the case yesterday with Flat Creek, because the marsh was frozen much more solidly than usual, we were able to get down to tidewater where we found a pleasant surprise: Beavers! This beaver lodge had clear signs of recent activity.

Not far downstream, I came across the biggest of several dams. It's approximately 40' long by about 18" high, and is probably close to underwater at high tide. Right now, you can see that it is impounding quite a bit of water in an area that would normally be dry.






